Evaluation of two Bacillus sp. strains as an alternative to chemical fungicides for controlling Botrytis cinerea in roses destined for preservation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v16.4332

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as biocontrol agents against Botrytis cinerea in rose crops destined for preservation in Cayambe, Ecuador. A randomized complete block design was used with nine treatments: six biological (three concentrations of each species) and three chemical treatments. The incidence and severity of the pathogen were evaluated weekly, along with economic indicators such as the cost-benefit ratio (CBR) and net benefit (NB). The biological treatment B1D3 (B. subtilis 1×10¹² CFU/ml) demonstrated the highest effectiveness, reducing incidence to 21.7% and severity to 7.61%, significantly outperforming the chemical treatments Q1, Q2, and Q3, whose values ranged between 24.2%-30.8% for incidence and 9.25%-10.80% for severity. Economically, B1D3 also stood out, achieving a CBR 10% higher and an NB approximately 40% greater than the closest chemical treatment (Q2). In contrast, lower-concentration biological treatments, such as B2D1 (B. amyloliquefaciens 1×10⁶ CFU/ml), were less effective, with incidences of 40.4% and severities of 21.6%. These results position B1D3 as a sustainable and economically viable alternative to traditional chemical fungicides, reinforcing its utility for integrated management of B. cinerea. This study supports the use of Bacillus as an effective and cost-efficient strategy that enhances the sustainability of floriculture while reducing the environmental impact associated with synthetic chemical use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Emanuel , M. R. J., & Meneses Quelal, O. (2025). Evaluation of two Bacillus sp. strains as an alternative to chemical fungicides for controlling Botrytis cinerea in roses destined for preservation. Comunicata Scientiae, 16, e4332. https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v16.4332

Issue

Section

Original Article